Russian suppliers, half 2 with 3 VPS/suppliers

This can be a new second a part of my older "Russian VPS" thread. Subsequent to my very own private curiosity it was impressed each by constructive criticism/solutions by some customers (@raynor, to call one) in addition to a few customers contacting me privately with questions. Aside from the LET typical request for affordable (however midway respectable) VPS there appears to be some curiosity in VPS with increased bandwith than the standard 100 or 200 Mb/s. Et voila, right here you go … albeit with a grain of salt:

The primary VPS comes from ‘hosting-russia’ and prices a beestick over €2 per 30 days. Observe although that it is not their least expensive VPS which prices a bit below €1/mo, however solely gives 100 Mb/s. This one nevertheless comes with 1 Gb/s, 1 vCore, 1 GB mem., 20 GB SSD, 30 TB visitors and as much as 10 Gb/s DDOS safety.
Up to now the idea, listed here are the true world information (based mostly on about 35 runs):

Model 2.5.0, (c) 2018+ jsg (->lowendtalk.com)
Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Mannequin: QEMU Digital CPU model 2.5+
OS, model: FreeBSD 13.0, Mem.: 990 MB
CPU – Cores: 1, Household/Mannequin/Stepping: 6/13/3
Cache: 32K/32K L1d/L1i, 2M L2, 16M L3
Std. Flags: fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36
cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 sse3 cx16 x2apic hypervisor
Ext. Flags: syscall nx lm lahf_lm

AES? No
Nested Virt.? No
HW RNG? No

ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 134.7 – min 41.1 (30.5 %), max 228.8 (169.8 %)
ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 220.5 – min 207.6 (94.1 %), max 232.1 (105.3 %)
ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 222.5 – min 210.1 (94.4 %), max 232.6 (104.5 %)
ProcMem AES [MB/s]: avg 223.5 – min 205.7 (92.0 %), max 235.7 (105.5 %)
ProcMem RSA [kp/s]: avg 48.0 – min 41.1 (85.5 %), max 51.5 (107.2 %)

Not even AES {hardware} assist, meeh, and (my educated guess) Xeon 24xxL efficiency. Funnily RSA efficiency is best than fairly a couple of different lowest value VPS from different suppliers. Additionally be aware the fairly acceptably low unfold aside from single-core mode.

Now, on to the disk:

— Disk 4 KB – Buffered —
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 8.57 – min 7.76 (90.6%), max 9.29 (108.4%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 8.36 – min 7.58 (90.7%), max 9.50 (113.7%)
Learn seq. [MB/s]: avg 25.17 – min 21.96 (87.2%), max 28.17 (111.9%)
Learn rnd. [MB/s]: avg 21.88 – min 19.24 (87.9%), max 24.82 (113.4%)
— Disk 4 KB – Sync/Direct —
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 7.52 – min 6.13 (81.5%), max 8.73 (116.1%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 7.47 – min 6.67 (89.3%), max 8.60 (115.1%)
Learn seq. [MB/s]: avg 23.59 – min 17.02 (72.1%), max 27.88 (118.2%)
Learn rnd. [MB/s]: avg 21.11 – min 16.35 (77.4%), max 24.41 (115.6%)

— Disk 64 KB – Buffered —
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 59.14 – min 47.46 (80.3%), max 68.38 (115.6%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 70.47 – min 58.85 (83.5%), max 81.85 (116.1%)
Learn seq. [MB/s]: avg 774.51 – min 662.73 (85.6%), max 883.64 (114.1%)
Learn rnd. [MB/s]: avg 288.49 – min 264.00 (91.5%), max 325.72 (112.9%)
— Disk 64 KB – Sync/Direct —
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 6.15 – min 5.48 (89.2%), max 6.75 (109.8%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 4.62 – min 4.26 (92.3%), max 4.96 (107.4%)
Learn seq. [MB/s]: avg 764.29 – min 554.60 (72.6%), max 848.10 (111.0%)
Learn rnd. [MB/s]: avg 272.55 – min 216.29 (79.4%), max 311.22 (114.2%)

— Disk 1 MB – Buffered —
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 69.80 – min 59.83 (85.7%), max 77.98 (111.7%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 158.09 – min 136.77 (86.5%), max 184.37 (116.6%)
Learn seq. [MB/s]: avg 1249.75 – min 913.03 (73.1%), max 1423.08 (113.9%)
Learn rnd. [MB/s]: avg 920.23 – min 767.87 (83.4%), max 1128.65 (122.6%)
— Disk 1 MB – Sync/Direct —
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 39.83 – min 34.57 (86.8%), max 44.58 (111.9%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 53.85 – min 47.66 (88.5%), max 60.42 (112.2%)
Learn seq. [MB/s]: avg 1255.14 – min 1137.88 (90.7%), max 1425.57 (113.6%)
Learn rnd. [MB/s]: avg 930.13 – min 773.95 (83.2%), max 1110.05 (119.3%)
— Disk IOps (Sync/Direct) —
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 9.10 – min 8.37 (92.0%), max 10.10 (111.0%)
IOps : avg 2330.21 – min 2142.56 (91.9%), max 2584.66 (110.9%)

Good, very nice for such an affordable VPS. Being at that I would like to say one thing attention-grabbing: this machine has accomplished about 2 to three instances the variety of check runs the opposite 2 machines achieved in about the identical time, though it has a processor that’s comparatively sluggish. Why is that attention-grabbing? As a result of most of your methods do not run CPU-heavy duties both and whereas usually sitting within the second or third row disk efficiency is vital and push an in any other case good VPS down or pull a not so nice VPS fairly a bit up.
Btw. be aware that this technique is according to little unfold that’s, whereas the disk is "solely" SSD, it’s a fairly good performer and you may depend on the efficiency. All in all I prefer it.

On to the community:

— Community —
US LAX lax.obtain.datapacket.com [F: 0]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 60.1 – min 51.5 (85.6%), max 63.1 (104.9%)
Ping [ms]: avg 182.7 – min 179.0 (98.0%), max 189.4 (103.7%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 184.6 – min 180.7 (97.9%), max 198.5 (107.5%)

NO OSL speedtest.osl01.softlayer.com [F: 37]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 0.0 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 0.0 (0.0%)
Ping [ms]: avg 0.0 – min 0.0 (-nan%), max 0.0 (-nan%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 0.0 – min 0.0 (-nan%), max 0.0 (-nan%)

US SJC speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 54.6 – min 51.3 (93.9%), max 56.8 (104.0%)
Ping [ms]: avg 187.5 – min 187.1 (99.8%), max 189.2 (100.9%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 201.0 – min 187.1 (93.1%), max 699.7 (348.1%)

AU MEL speedtest.c1.mel1.dediserve.com [F: 4]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 25.5 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 29.6 (116.2%)
Ping [ms]: avg 325.1 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 355.2 (109.3%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 327.2 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 360.5 (110.2%)

JP TOK speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com [F: 28]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 6.3 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 35.8 (564.3%)
Ping [ms]: avg 167.2 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 198.1 (118.5%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 167.3 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 198.1 (118.4%)

IT MIL speedtest.mil01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 154.6 – min 148.8 (96.2%), max 157.2 (101.7%)
Ping [ms]: avg 65.3 – min 65.0 (99.5%), max 72.8 (111.4%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 65.7 – min 65.0 (98.9%), max 77.8 (118.4%)

TR UNK 185.65.204.169 [F: 0]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 82.3 – min 41.5 (50.5%), max 85.3 (103.6%)
Ping [ms]: avg 77.4 – min 76.4 (98.7%), max 99.0 (127.9%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 77.9 – min 76.7 (98.5%), max 99.1 (127.3%)

FR PAR speedtest.par01.softlayer.com [F: 4]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 181.8 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 212.5 (116.8%)
Ping [ms]: avg 49.7 – min 49.4 (99.3%), max 51.7 (103.9%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 50.2 – min 49.5 (98.7%), max 51.7 (103.1%)

SG SGP mirror.sg.leaseweb.internet [F: 0]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 59.3 – min 49.7 (83.8%), max 60.5 (102.0%)
Ping [ms]: avg 189.4 – min 189.2 (99.9%), max 191.6 (101.1%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 189.9 – min 189.2 (99.7%), max 193.4 (101.9%)

BR SAO speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com [F: 6]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 36.2 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 45.4 (125.5%)
Ping [ms]: avg 244.3 – min 244.1 (99.9%), max 245.4 (100.4%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 263.7 – min 244.1 (92.6%), max 862.9 (327.2%)

IN CHN speedtest.che01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 58.2 – min 55.0 (94.6%), max 62.0 (106.5%)
Ping [ms]: avg 170.3 – min 164.2 (96.4%), max 179.7 (105.5%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 203.1 – min 165.2 (81.3%), max 752.4 (370.5%)

GR UNK speedtest.ftp.otenet.gr [F: 18]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 74.2 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 151.1 (203.8%)
Ping [ms]: avg 40.8 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 84.7 (207.6%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 41.1 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 90.9 (221.3%)

US WDC mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.internet [F: 0]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 100.0 – min 94.2 (94.2%), max 102.3 (102.3%)
Ping [ms]: avg 113.6 – min 112.6 (99.1%), max 119.1 (104.8%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 114.5 – min 112.6 (98.3%), max 121.8 (106.3%)

RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 1017.7 – min 894.8 (87.9%), max 1103.1 (108.4%)
Ping [ms]: avg 1.3 – min 1.1 (88.0%), max 1.5 (120.0%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 1.8 – min 1.2 (67.1%), max 6.3 (352.1%)

US DAL speedtest.dal05.softlayer.com [F: 0]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 63.9 – min 61.0 (95.6%), max 66.2 (103.7%)
Ping [ms]: avg 160.2 – min 159.9 (99.8%), max 160.6 (100.3%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 190.8 – min 159.9 (83.8%), max 1005.7 (527.1%)

UK LON speedtest.lon02.softlayer.com [F: 0]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 217.1 – min 210.2 (96.8%), max 231.5 (106.7%)
Ping [ms]: avg 47.6 – min 47.3 (99.3%), max 50.4 (105.9%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 72.9 – min 47.4 (65.0%), max 997.2 (1367.7%)

US NYC nyc.obtain.datapacket.com [F: 0]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 100.2 – min 91.2 (91.0%), max 105.1 (104.9%)
Ping [ms]: avg 110.8 – min 109.4 (98.7%), max 113.4 (102.3%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 113.1 – min 109.7 (97.0%), max 134.0 (118.5%)

RO BUC 185.183.99.8 [F: 1]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 167.7 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 183.4 (109.4%)
Ping [ms]: avg 63.9 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 71.9 (112.6%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 66.7 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 106.1 (159.1%)

NL AMS mirror.nl.leaseweb.internet [F: 4]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 254.7 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 305.5 (119.9%)
Ping [ms]: avg 36.4 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 42.5 (116.7%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 45.9 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 398.0 (867.2%)

CN HK mirror.hk.leaseweb.internet [F: 6]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 31.6 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 50.5 (160.0%)
Ping [ms]: avg 237.7 – min 223.0 (93.8%), max 269.9 (113.6%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 245.2 – min 224.2 (91.4%), max 282.4 (115.2%)

DE FRA fra.lg.core-backbone.com [F: 0]
DL [Mb/s]: avg 221.6 – min 58.5 (26.4%), max 330.1 (149.0%)
Ping [ms]: avg 37.5 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 43.4 (115.7%)
Net ping [ms]: avg 40.2 – min 0.0 (0.0%), max 45.0 (112.0%)

1 Gb/s? … Effectively, sure – however solely inside Moscow … a lot for ‘1 Gb/s’.
To wherever else connectivity is let’s name it OK, learn, throughout the traditional body apart from a couple of main european targets being above 200 and as much as 250 Mb/s.

Observe that hosting-russia provides English each for the panel which is the ISPsystem panel usually encountered with russian suppliers. And sure, you’ll be able to mount ISOs too.
As for his or her assist which presumably is on the market in English too, nicely I am unable to let you know something as a result of every thing labored so nicely and simple (as soon as one is aware of one’s means round with that panel) that I merely did not want any assist. I need to point out although that I additionally did not see any hyperlink to assist or for opening a ticket; is perhaps merely me not seeing it although.

In all probability I am going to benchmark their small 1€ VPS too over the weekend. In that case you will discover a mini-review right here.

🔥 Hot and trending web hostings deals 🔥

HostingsCoupons.com - Web Hostings Coupons, Sales, Deals and Discounts
Logo